In an action based on unfair competition in the use of a trade name in the same line of business, appellant contends that the name, “Mack’s Bootery, Inc.” is a simulation or imitation of the name “Jack’s Shoes,” and that respondents have in other ways held themselves out as connected or associated with appellant’s business. Order denying appellant’s motion to punish respondents for contempt of the judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
282 A.D. 731
Hempstead Shoe Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Jack’s Bootery, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Hempstead Shoe Co. v. Jack’s Bootery, Inc.
282 A.D. 731
Case Details
282 A.D. 731
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!