The identical question her© presented was involved in 18426, Omer Mc-Kown v. Sherman Haught, this day decided (130 Okla. 253), and by stipulation of the parties these cases were submitted on the same briefs. We have examined the record in the instant case, and find ample evidence) to support the findings of the trial court, and the judgment rendered thereon. The decision in MeKown v. Haught, supra, is therefore controlling here, and, upjon authority of that case, it is ordered that the judgment herein be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
MASON, Y. O. J., and HARRIS ON, LESTER, CLARK, and RILEY, JJ., concur.