The contention of the plaintiff in error is controlled adversely by the case of Jones v. Hicks, 150 Ga. 657 (104 S. E. 771, 10 A. L. R. 1315), the request to review which is denied.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
No. 2488.
July 13, 1921.
Habeas corpus. Before Judge Meldrim. Chatham superior court. January 8, 1931.
Robert L. Golding and Lawrence & Abrahams, for plaintiff.
Walter G. Hartridge, solicitor-general, for defendant.
The contention of the plaintiff in error is controlled adversely by the case of Jones v. Hicks, 150 Ga. 657 (104 S. E. 771, 10 A. L. R. 1315), the request to review which is denied.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
151 Ga. 708
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!