254 Or. 202 458 P.2d 445

Argued June 5,

affirmed September 10, 1969

JOHNSON et ux, Appellants, v. GILLEY et ux, Respondents.

458 P2d 445

John H. Horn, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed briefs for the appellants.

Dudley C. Walton, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.

Before Sloan, Presiding Justice, and O’Connell, Goodwin, Denecke and Holman, Justices.

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal a decree quieting title in tbe defendants to a disputed strip of land in tbe Fruitvale subdivision of Eoseburg.

*203The controversy arose ont of differences in surveys. The disputed strip is approximately 458 feet long and tapers from a width of 2.2 feet on the east end of the strip to approximately one foot on the west. The trial court considered three different surveys by three different surveyors, together with a substantial volume of other evidence, and settled the dispute by adopting the most recent survey as the true line between the neighbors. The survey which the court adopted described a line established by adverse possession.

We have found nothing in the record to justify reversal of the decree.

Affirmed.

Johnson v. Gilley
254 Or. 202 458 P.2d 445

Case Details

Name
Johnson v. Gilley
Decision Date
Sep 10, 1969
Citations

254 Or. 202

458 P.2d 445

Jurisdiction
Oregon

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!