This case being for decision by the entire court of six Justices, who are evenly divided in opinion, Beck, P. J., and Gilbert and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial, and Russell, G. J., and Atkinson and Hill, JJ., being of *559the opinion that the court erred in not granting a new trial, the judgment stands affirmed hy operation of law.
No. 4603.
January 15, 1925.
W. H. Duckworth, for plaintiffs in error.
Jeff A. Pope, contra.