{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm.
102 Ohio St. 3d 1244
Brady-Fray, Admr., Appellee, v. Toledo Edison Company et al., Appellants.
[Cite as Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co., 102 Ohio St.3d 1244, 2004-Ohio-3591 .]
(No. 2003-1443
Submitted June 8, 2004
Decided July 21, 2004.)
Blumenstiel, Huhn, Adams & Evans, L.L.C., and J.B. Blumenstiel; Kolb & Heban and Richard Kolb, for appellee.
Roetzel & Andress, L.P.A., Denise M. Hasbrook, Alisa L. Wright and Brad A. Rimmel, for appellant Toledo Edison Company.
Baran, Piper, Tarkowsky, Fitzgerald & Theis Co., L.P.A., and Donald E. Theis, for appellant Asplundh Tree Expert Company.
Botros, Kollin & Schulte, L.L.C., Richard W. Schulte and Stephen D. Behnke, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.
Calfee, Halter & Griswold, L.L.P., Thomas I. Michals and Mark L. Belleville, urging reversal for amici curiae Columbus Southern Power Company, Ohio Power Company, Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc., Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Ohio Edison Company, Dayton Power & Light Company, and Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company.
Brady-Fray v. Toledo Edison Co.
102 Ohio St. 3d 1244
Case Details
102 Ohio St. 3d 1244
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!