92 Fla. 9

C. E. Melton and Standard Accident Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. James J. Rick, Defendant in Error.

Division B.

Decision Filed June 11, 1926.

Petition for Rehearing Denied July 29, 1926.

Fee <& Liddon, for Plaintiffs in Error;

Nisle & Vocelle, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said *10judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Melton v. Rick
92 Fla. 9

Case Details

Name
Melton v. Rick
Decision Date
Jun 11, 1926
Citations

92 Fla. 9

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!