112 N.J. Eq. 90

James Radcliffe & Sons Company et al., respondents, v. Charles E. Knoble, Jr., et al., appellants.

[Decided January 5th, 1933.]

Mr. James N. Wright and Messrs. Sticlcel & Sticlcel, for the respondents.

Frances Hart, for the appellants.

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N. J. Eq. 309, sub nom. James Radcliffe, &c., Sons Co. v. Borough of Hawthorne.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, ECeher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble
112 N.J. Eq. 90

Case Details

Name
James Radcliffe & Sons Co. v. Knoble
Decision Date
Jan 5, 1933
Citations

112 N.J. Eq. 90

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!