There are numerous objections and exceptions to evidence There are, however, none presenting other than the most elementary principles. From the entire record it appears that the defendant had a fair trial, in which no error appears prejudicial to his substantial rights. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.
19 Ala. App. 681 •
8 Div. 109 •
99 So. 925
(99 South. 925)
(8 Div. 109.)
Robert GLOVER v. STATE.
(Court of Appeals of Alabama.
April 8, 1923.)
Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; James E. Horton, Jr.,’ Judge. Defendant was convicted of possessing a still, and appeals.
R. E.' Smith, of Huntsville, for appellant.
Harwell G. Davis, Atty, Gen., for the State.
Glover v. State
19 Ala. App. 681 •
8 Div. 109 •
99 So. 925
Case Details
19 Ala. App. 681
8 Div. 109
99 So. 925
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!