51 Mich. 185

Erhard Kundinger v. The Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Company.

Oonclumeness of findings of fact.

.A finding of fact in a case at law tried without a jury, is conclusive where there is any evidence to found it upon, even though the evidence is conflicting.

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.)

June 22.

June 22.

Case. Defendant brings error.

Affirmed.

WilUam, H. Bussell and George Jerome for appellant.

Edwcvrd A. Gott for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The only question in this case is whether the evidence in the case conclusively made out negligence on the part of plaintiff contributing to the injury of which he complains. Unless it did, he was entitled to recover. "We find, on examination, that there was evidence of such *186negligence, and also evidence of dne care; and the question-having been decided on the facts in plaintiffs favor, the finding is conclusive, and no question of law arises for decision now.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Kundinger v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
51 Mich. 185

Case Details

Name
Kundinger v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Decision Date
Jun 22, 1883
Citations

51 Mich. 185

Jurisdiction
Michigan

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!