326 F. App'x 225

Annis Recardo LLOYD, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Connie JORDAN; Judge J. Hockenbury; Judge Lanier; Roddey Brown, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 09-6148.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 29, 2009.

Annis Recardo Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action alleging violation of his constitutional rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v. Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03143-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2009).

We deny Lloyd’s motion for injunctive relief and motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *226in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Lloyd v. Jordan
326 F. App'x 225

Case Details

Name
Lloyd v. Jordan
Decision Date
May 29, 2009
Citations

326 F. App'x 225

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!