The same question is presented in this case as is- presented in City of New York v. Sixth Ave. R. Co. (decided herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp. 319; and, for the reasons there stated, we think that the judgment appealed from, so far as it overrules the joint demurrer of the defendants, and the separate demurrers of- the Central Park, North & East River Railroad Company and the Metropolitan Cross-Town Railway Company, should be reversed, and the demurrers sustained, with costs in this court and in the court below, and that the judgment, so far as it overrules the separate demurrer of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company, should be affirmed, with costs, with leave to the Metropolitan Street Railway Company to answer on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. All concur.
79 N.Y.S. 1128
CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CENTRAL PARK, N. & E. R. R. CO. et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 19, 1902.)
Action by the city of New York against the Central Park, North & East River Railroad Company and others. From an interlocutory judgm'ent overruling demurrers to the complaints, defendants appeal. Reversed in part.
Charles F. Brown, for appellants.
Chase Mellen, for respondent.
City of New York v. Central Park, North & East River Railroad
79 N.Y.S. 1128
Case Details
79 N.Y.S. 1128
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!