Judgment and order aimed, with costs.
97 N.Y.S. 1139
LANE, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, ppellate Division, Fourth Department,
arch 28, 1906.)
Action by Frank Lane ainst the New York Central & Hudson River tilroad Company.
dissents, upon the ground at no negligence was shown on the part of the fendant, that plaintiff assumed the risk, and at the exceptions as to evidence and the arge of the court present reversible errors.
Lane v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
97 N.Y.S. 1139
Case Details
97 N.Y.S. 1139
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!