106 So. 3d 1009

SOUTHEAST FISH AND SEAFOOD CO., etc., Appellant, v. Edsel CADENA, Appellee.

No. 3D12-1246.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 20, 2013.

Roniel Rodriguez, IV, Aventura, for appellant.

Ritter Chusid Bivona & Cohen, LLP, and Shawn R. Horwick, Boca Raton, and Gregory Ritter, Coral Springs, for appel-lee.

Before SUAREZ, CORTINAS and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.”).

Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena
106 So. 3d 1009

Case Details

Name
Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena
Decision Date
Feb 20, 2013
Citations

106 So. 3d 1009

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!