49 Or. App. 588 619 P.2d 1355

Argued and submitted November 14,

reversed and remanded December 8, 1980,

reconsideration denied January 22, petition for review denied March 17, 1981 (290 Or 651)

BRUMMETT, Respondent, v. PARSON et al, Appellants.

(No. 78-7563, CA 16819)

619 P2d 1355

Terence J. Hammons, Eugene, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Hammons & Jensen, Eugene.

William L. Tufts, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert E. Krambs and Barber & Krambs, Eugene.

Before Joseph, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Warren, Judges.

PER CURIAM

*588-aPER CURIAM

In this action for fraud defendants appeal a judgment in favor of the plaintiff based on the jury verdict. Defendants assign as error the trial court’s refusal of defendants’ request for a poll of the jury, made immediately after the verdict was received. The statute in effect when this case was tried, ORS 17.355 (since repealed but with substantially the same language preserved in Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 59 G.(3)), gives a party an absolute right to a poll upon request. See Eisele v. Rood, 275 Or 461, 551 P2d 441 (1976).

A review of that portion of the record relevant to this issue satisfies us that defendants did not waive their right to have the jury polled.

Reversed and remanded.

Brummett v. Parson
49 Or. App. 588 619 P.2d 1355

Case Details

Name
Brummett v. Parson
Decision Date
Dec 8, 1980
Citations

49 Or. App. 588

619 P.2d 1355

Jurisdiction
Oregon

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!