The judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ proceeding in lieu of prerogative writs, which sought a referendum to reject the 1968 budget adopted by the City of Jersey City, is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Artaserse in his opinion reported at 101 N. J. Super. 15 (Law Div. 1968).
103 N.J. Super. 217
PAUL CUPROWSKI, MARY E. VERDIRANO, JAMES J. MACK, FRANK S. MONACO, AND JEROME LAZARUS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND WILLIAM P. BLACK, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division
Argued October 8, 1968
Decided October 16, 1968.
Before Judges Gaulkix, Collestek and Labkecque.
Mr. Gerold Kanengiser argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Gordon and Kanengiser, attorneys).
Mr. James F. Ryan argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Francis X. Hayes, of counsel).
Cuprowski v. City of Jersey City
103 N.J. Super. 217
Case Details
103 N.J. Super. 217
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!