David A. Richardson appeals from the tax court’s orders: (1) denying his motion for leave to file a motion to vacate the tax court’s prior order resolving a dispute with respect to Richardson’s federal income tax for the 1989 to 1994 tax years, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration of that denial. Our review of the record and *646the tax court’s orders discloses no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Richardson v. Comm’r, No. 97-12718 (U.S. Tax Ct. July 6 & July 27, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED