98 N.J.L. 901

BRIDGET SHEEHAN, RESPONDENT, v. EDWARD W. LEE, DIRECTOR OF REVENUE AND FINANCE, AND FREDERICK W. DONNELLY ET AL., THE POLICE AND FIRE COMMISSION OF TRENTON, N. J., APPELLANTS.

Submitted March 26, 1923

Decided April 20, 1923.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 96 N. J. L. 341.

Por the appellants, Katzenbach & Hunt.

Por the respondent, Henry M. Hartman.

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Kalis ch, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heepenheimer, Ackerson, Van Buskirk, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Sheehan v. Lee
98 N.J.L. 901

Case Details

Name
Sheehan v. Lee
Decision Date
Apr 20, 1923
Citations

98 N.J.L. 901

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!