1 N.J. 491

SIMON WOLK, COMPLAINANT-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM WIDLANSKY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued February 21, 1949

Decided February 28, 1949.

Mr. Samuel H. Nelson argued the cause for the complainant-appellant (Mr. Herman H. Anekstein, attorney).

*492 Mir. Stephen V. R. Strong argued tHe cause for the defendants-respondents (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys)

Per Curiam.

The decree under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Vice Chancellor Jayne in the former Court of Chancery.

For affirmance: Chief Justice Vanderbilt and Justices Case, Heher, Wacheneeld, Burling, and Ackerson—6.

For reversal: None.

Wolk v. Widlansky
1 N.J. 491

Case Details

Name
Wolk v. Widlansky
Decision Date
Feb 28, 1949
Citations

1 N.J. 491

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!