Despite the unquestionable sincerity of plaintiff’s counsel, we are satisfied that Judge Pierce acted well within his discretion in denying temporary injunc-tive relief. 371 F.Supp. 701. His order is therefore affirmed.
493 F.2d 1352
HARLEM RIVER CONSUMERS COOPERATIVE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED GROCERS OF HARLEM, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 1016, Docket 74-1237.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued April 9, 1974.
Decided April 11, 1974.
Cora T. Walker, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Joseph Zuckerman, New York City (Rosenman, Colin, Kaye,' Petschek, Freund & Emil, of counsel), for defendant-appellee Retail, Wholesale & Chain Store Food Employees Union, Local 338.
Roberto Lebrón, New York City, for defendant-appellee Fedco Foods, Inc.
Howard B. Weinreich, and Guggenhei-mer & Untermyer, New York City, for defendant-appellee Shopwell, Inc.
Bernard J. Ferguson, Woodside, N. Y., for defendant-appellee Mid-Eastern Cooperatives, Inc.
Walter Steck, and Farber, Raucher & Goldberg, New York City, for defendant-appellee Pioneer Food Stores, Inc.
Stanley Bierman, and Unterberg, Ban-dler & Goldstein, New York City, for defendant-appellee Associated Food Stores, Inc.
Robert Sugerman, and Berger, Kramer & Levenson, New York City, for defendant-appellee Sloan’s Supermarkets, Inc.
Sol Needle, and Sirota & Kurta, New York City, for defendant-appellees Theodore Solomon, Aaron Kaufman and Harry Rosenblum.
Before FRIENDLY and HAYS, Circuit Judges, and THOMSEN,* District Judge.
Harlem River Consumers Cooperative, Inc. v. Associated Grocers of Harlem, Inc.
493 F.2d 1352
Case Details
493 F.2d 1352
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!