135 Okla. 185

CHICAGO, R. I. & P. RY. CO. v. SATTERFIELD, Co. Treas.

No. 18684.

Opinion Filed Feb. 26, 1929.

*186W. R. Bleakmore, A. T. Boys and John Barry, for plaintiff in error.

Edwin -Dabney, Atty. Gen., Y. P. Crowe, Asst. Atty. Gen., W. T. Dixon, Co. Atty, John W. Tyree, Asst. Co. Atty,, and Ray & Thomas, for defendant in error.

HEFNER, J.

The facts in this case are the same as in the case of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff in Error v. Iona C. Satterfield, as County Treasurer, Defendant in Error, 135 Okla. 183, 275 Pac. 303, and upon the authority of that case the judgment of the trial. court in this case is affirmed.

LESTER, V. C J., and HUNT, CLARK, RILEY. CULLISON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.

MASON, C. J., absent.

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Satterfield
135 Okla. 185

Case Details

Name
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Satterfield
Decision Date
Feb 26, 1929
Citations

135 Okla. 185

Jurisdiction
Oklahoma

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!