82 N.J. Eq. 661

David Potter, trustee, &c., appellant, v. Mary Alice Nixon, administratrix, et al., respondents.

[Submitted December 6th, 1913.

Decided March 16th, 1914.]

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning, whose opinion is reported in 81 N. J. Eq. (11 Buck,.) 888.

Messrs. Hampton & Fithian, for the appellant.

Mr. Walter H. Bacon, for Mary Alice Nixon, administratrix, respondent.

Mr. John B. B. Nixon, for Mary Nixon Everett, executrix, &c., respondent.

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Congdon, White, Heppenheimer—13.

For reversal—None.

Potter v. Nixon
82 N.J. Eq. 661

Case Details

Name
Potter v. Nixon
Decision Date
Mar 16, 1914
Citations

82 N.J. Eq. 661

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!