133 A.3d 290

Kashyism MANSON, Petitioner v. *291Judge Susan I. SCHULMAN, Respondent.

No. 6 EM 2016.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

March 7, 2016.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 608 Pa. 71, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (2010) (explaining that a pro se filing presented by an appellant represented by counsel is a “legal nullity").

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Manson v. Schulman
133 A.3d 290

Case Details

Name
Manson v. Schulman
Decision Date
Mar 7, 2016
Citations

133 A.3d 290

Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!