397 F. App'x 870

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John D. RIDDICK, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 10-6242.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 28, 2010.

Decided: Oct. 13, 2010.

John D. Riddick, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John D. Riddick, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Riddick, No. 2:00-cr-00067-JBF-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *871in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Riddick
397 F. App'x 870

Case Details

Name
United States v. Riddick
Decision Date
Oct 13, 2010
Citations

397 F. App'x 870

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!