The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.
Pfeifer, J., dissents.
83 Ohio St. 3d 368
The State ex rel. Koehler, Appellant, v. Conrad, Admr., et al., Appellees.
[Cite as State ex rel. Koehler v. Conrad (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 368.]
(No. 97-2021
Submitted August 19, 1998
Decided October 14, 1998.)
Kondritzer, Gold, Frank & Crowley Co., L.P.A., and Lane N. Cohen, for appellant.
Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Steven P. Fixler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.
Douglas, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
State ex rel. Koehler v. Conrad
83 Ohio St. 3d 368
Case Details
83 Ohio St. 3d 368
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!