The request to charge was sufficiently covered by. the charge given, and the verdict was authorized by the evidence. See Oopelamd v. State (a companion case to the case at bar), 33 Ga. App. 150.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
16837.
Decided December 15, 1925.
F. H. Saffold, for plaintiff in error.
Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, A. S. Bradley, I. W. Rountree, contra.
The request to charge was sufficiently covered by. the charge given, and the verdict was authorized by the evidence. See Oopelamd v. State (a companion case to the case at bar), 33 Ga. App. 150.
Judgment affirmed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.
34 Ga. App. 683
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!