Submitted July 10, 1914—
Decided March 25, 1915.
On error to the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed:
“Per curiam—The indictment in this case must be quashed. The case cannot be distinguished from State v. Nugent, 48 Vroom 157.”
Eor ilie plaintiff in error, Harlan Besson and Mark Townsend, Jr.
Eor the defendant in error, Robert H. Hudspeth, prosecutor of the pleas.
The court being equally divided in opinion, the judgment under review must be affirmed.
*330 For affirmance—The Ci-iiee Justice, Parker, Minturn, Kalisct-i, Bogeet, Vredenburgh, Williams, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenohard,' Black, White, Terhune, Hepeenheimer, JJ. 7.
87 N.J.L. 329
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!