District of Columbia v. Steinberg 37 F.2d 448

37 F.2d 448

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Flora G. STEINBERG, Defendant in Error. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edith W. ELY, Defendant in Error. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Madeline PADGETT, Defendant in Error. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edna Ellis HILTON, Defendant in Error.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Argued January 7, 1929.

Reargued February 4, 1929.

Decided February 25, 1929.

Motion of Second Rehearing Denied December 2, 1929.

Nos. 4804-4807.

W. W. Bride and F. H. Stephens, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.

Paul E. Lesh, of Washington, D. C., for defendants in error.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

These are writs of error to the municipal court, and involve the question just determined in No. 4803, District of Columbia v. Newman, 59 App. D. C. 163, 37 F.(2d) 444. For reasons there stated, the judgment in each case is reversed, with costs, and the causes are remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Reversed.

District of Columbia v. Steinberg
37 F.2d 448

Case Details

Name
District of Columbia v. Steinberg
Decision Date
Feb 25, 1929
Citations

37 F.2d 448

Jurisdiction
United States
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!