The order of Special Term should be affirmed. It may not be said that the refusal of the Superintendent of Insurance and the Attorney-General, was without reasonable basis. We do not pass upon any of the other questions ruled upon by Special Term, including the question as to whether this policyholder has the right to institute suit. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Frank, JJ.
1 A.D.2d 820
In the Matter of Gustave B. Garfield, on Behalf of Himself and All Members and Policyholders of Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Similarly Situated, Appellant, against Leffert Holz, as Superintendent of Insurance, et al., Respondents, and Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Intervenor-Respondent.
Garfield v. Holz
1 A.D.2d 820
Case Details
1 A.D.2d 820
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!