124 Or. 173 264 Pac. 356

Argued January 28,

affirmed February 14, 1928.

L. J. ADAMS v. S. HARMON and J. O. WILSON.

(264 Pac. 356.)

*174For appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Mr. Custer E. Boss.

For respondent there was a brief and oral arguments by Mr. L. J. Adams and Mr. W. C. Winslow.

McBRIDE, J.

There was a convenient place where the defendants could have dumped the surplus dirt on plaintiff’s property. Defendants saved themselves the expense of dumping it there by using plaintiff’s dirt to pay Webb for hauling it away to a distant locality. They had no right to do this, and the case comes clearly within the rule laid down by us in Sharkey Co. v. City of Portland, 58 Or. 353 (106 Pac. 331, 114 Pac. 933).

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Rand, O. J., and Coshow and Brown, JJ., concur.

Adams v. Harmon
124 Or. 173 264 Pac. 356

Case Details

Name
Adams v. Harmon
Decision Date
Feb 14, 1928
Citations

124 Or. 173

264 Pac. 356

Jurisdiction
Oregon

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!