650 So. 2d 1020

LENS EXPRESS, INC. and Mordechai Golan, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, Board of Optometry and Florida Optometric Association, Appellees.

No. 94-1773.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 1995.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 1995.

David E. Eastman and Carl R. Peterson, Jr. of Parker, Skelding, Labasky, Corry, Eastman & Hauser, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellants.

Rosa H. Carson of Carson, Linn & Adkins, Tallahassee, for appellees.

MICKLE, Judge.

We are asked to review a nonfinal administrative order compelling discovery. Via their responsive brief, the Florida Optometrie Association brings to our attention the fact that, per Lens Express’ motion below, the order from which the instant appeal is taken was modified by the hearing officer after the petition for review had been filed with this court. No appeal has been taken from the modified order. We are therefore without jurisdiction to review either the original or the modified order.

PETITION DISMISSED.

BOOTH and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Lens Express, Inc. v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation
650 So. 2d 1020

Case Details

Name
Lens Express, Inc. v. Department of Business & Professional Regulation
Decision Date
Jan 10, 1995
Citations

650 So. 2d 1020

Jurisdiction
Florida

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!