Upon authority of Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957, this cause is reversed and remanded for a new trial for failure of the defendants in error to file a brief as required by rule 7 of this court. Brief of the plaintiff in error was served and filed December 5, 1925.
114 Okla. 227
ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RY. CO. v. PITTS, County Treas., et al.
No. 16815
Opinion Filed April 13, 1926.
E. T. Miller, Stuart, Sharp & Cruce, and AV. T. Stratton, for plaintiff in error.
Jno. AV. Porter, City Attorney, and S. H. Lattimore, County Attorney, for defendants in error.
St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pitts
114 Okla. 227
Case Details
114 Okla. 227
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!