344 F. App'x 380

Andres Ernesto HERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Miguel VILLICANA, Lieutenant, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 08-55778.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2009.*

Filed Sept. 2, 2009.

Andres Ernesto Hernandez, Represa, CA, pro se.

David B. Wallace, Assistant U.S., Samuel William Bettwy, Assistant U.S., Office of The U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: HUG, SKOPIL and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM **

Andres Ernesto Hernandez appeals pro se from the district court’s final judgment in favor of Defendant Villicana after the jury returned a verdict denying Hernandez’s claim brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We affirm.

The facts of the case are known to the parties and we do not repeat them here.

*381Hernandez waived his right to challenge on appeal the jury’s verdict because he did not file a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b). See Nitco Holding Corp. v. Boujikian, 491 F.3d 1086, 1089 (9th Cir.2007); Desrosiers v. Flight Int’l of Fla. Inc., 156 F.3d 952, 956-57 (9th Cir.1998).

AFFIRMED.

Hernandez v. Villicana
344 F. App'x 380

Case Details

Name
Hernandez v. Villicana
Decision Date
Sep 2, 2009
Citations

344 F. App'x 380

Jurisdiction
United States

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!