Opinion by
For the reasons stated in Nos. 231 and 232 of April Term, 1905, Trust Co. v. Cain, ante, pp. 189, 197, in which opinions have been this day filed, with which this case was tried in the court below, the judgment is affirmed.
29 Pa. Super. 199
Union Trust Company of Pittsburg, Appellant, v. Cain
(No. 3).
Argued April 26,1905.
Appeal, No. 233, April T., 1905, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April T., 1902, No. 614, on verdict for defendant non obstante veredicto in case of the Union Trust Company of Pittsburg, administrator of Johanna Montgomery, deceased, v. William H. Cain and Mary Eliza Cain, his wife, with notice to C. A. Tillman, terre-tenant.
Before Rice, P. J., Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Morrison and Henderson, JJ.
Affirmed.
October 9, 1905:
Union Trust Co. v. Cain
29 Pa. Super. 199
Case Details
29 Pa. Super. 199
References
Nothing yet... Still searching!
Nothing yet... Still searching!