1 Dall. 439 1 U.S. 439

JUNE TERM, 1789.

Holmes v. Comegys.

Witness. — Confidential Communications.

The confidential agent or factor of a party is not privileged from giving testimony.

This was a scire facias against the garnishee in a foreign attachment, upon the trial of which, the confidental agent or factor of the original defendants, who was casually attending in court, was offered as a witness, to prove effects in the hands of the garnishee.

JOevy,

objected to the admission of the witness ; and contended, that he ought not to be allowed, or, at least, compelled, to give evidence of matters confidentially communicated to him as an agent; and that the court had then no power over him as a witness, because he had not been subpoenaed to attend. But by—

Shippen, President.

It would be of very dangerous consequence, if it was established, that a commercial agent was not amenable as a witness in a court of justice, in a cause against his constituent. It is straining the matter of privilege too far. And if the law makes him a witness, we are too fond of getting at the truth, to permit him to excuse himself from declaring it, because he conceives, that, in point of delicacy, it would be a breach of confidence.

By the Court. — Let the witness be affirmed, (a)

Holmes v. Comegys
1 Dall. 439 1 U.S. 439

Case Details

Name
Holmes v. Comegys
Decision Date
Jun 1, 1789
Citations

1 Dall. 439

1 U.S. 439

Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!