66 N.J. 7

HARRY GOLDKLANG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Argued October 8, 1974

Decided October 22, 1974.

Mr. James A. Robottom argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Haskins, Robottom and Hack, attorneys).

Mr. Samuel H. Davis argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Dubowsky and Davis, attorneys).

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the majority of the Appellate Division.

Two members of the Court would reverse substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Meanor in his dissent reported at 130 N. J. Super. 307 (1974).

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Jacobs, Sullivan and Pashman and Judge Conford — 5.

For reversal — Justices Hall and Clifford — 2.

Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
66 N.J. 7

Case Details

Name
Goldklang v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Decision Date
Oct 22, 1974
Citations

66 N.J. 7

Jurisdiction
New Jersey

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!