1 Dall. 124 1 U.S. 124

Tracy v. Wikoff.

Confutation of interest.

In this cause, the Chief Justice laid down the following rule in computing interest.

McKean, Chief Justice.

The rule of computing interest must be such, that the interest of money paid in, before the time, must be deducted from the interest of the whole sum due at the time appointed by the instrument for making the payment. For instance, a bond to pay 100?. with annual interest at six per cent., and at the end of six months, 50?. is paid in. This payment shall not be apportioned, 3?. to the discharge of the half-year’s interest, and 47?. to the diminution of the principal ; so as to calculate the remaining interest at six per cent, upon -53?. for six months : but the interest shall be charged at the end of the year upon the 100?. ; the payment of 50?. shall then be deducted from the aggregate sum of 106?. and the obligor receive a credit for 1?. 10s. as interest of 50?. for six months. (a)

Tracy v. Wikoff
1 Dall. 124 1 U.S. 124

Case Details

Name
Tracy v. Wikoff
Decision Date
Apr 1, 1785
Citations

1 Dall. 124

1 U.S. 124

Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!