Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Richards 105 N.J. Super. 48

105 N.J. Super. 48

ATLANTIC MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION AND SAPOLIN PAINTS, INC., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. MARY A. RICHARDS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX, ETC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND NATIONAL LEAD COMPANY, ETC., DEFENDANT, AND THE EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP., LTD., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued February 13,1969

Decided February 26, 1969.

*49Before Judges Sullivan, Foley and Lewis.

Mr. Richard J. Badolaio argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Schneider & Morgan, attorneys).

Sonia Napolitano argued the cause for defendant-respondent (Messrs. Pindar, McElroy, Connell & Foley, attorneys).

Per Curiam.

The judgment herein is affirmed substan-

tially for the reasons given by Judge Purman in his opinion. In addition, we conclude that Sapolin Paints was not using the vehicle at the time of the accident in question and, therefore, was not an additional insured under Employers’ policy.

Affirmed.

Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Richards
105 N.J. Super. 48

Case Details

Name
Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Richards
Decision Date
Feb 26, 1969
Citations

105 N.J. Super. 48

Jurisdiction
New Jersey
Court
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!