324 Pa. 511

Rosengrant v. Frank Martz Coach Company, Appellant.

Argued November 25, 1936.

Before Kephart, C. J.v Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Stern and Barnes, JJ.

John P. Vallilee, of &'ohrier <& Vallilee, for appellant.

*512Wm. P. Wilson and J. Roy Lilley, for appellee, were not heard.

December 7, 1936:

Per Curiam,

Appellant challenges a return of service.* This return was the result of a petition to the court below to permit the sheriff to amend the return theretofore filed. Under the order granting amendment, the sheriff filed an amended return in conformity with the prayer. The court below treated as the amended return the petition, which had been verified before a notary public. Through immemorial usage, in most districts, the sheriff swears to his return before an officer of the court. Our research shows that there is no law in Pennsylvania which requires general verification of a sheriff’s return. However this may be, the return as amended was sworn to before the prothonotary and any objections as to verification are therefore eliminated. The amended return, though somewhat confusing, is in compliance with the statute: Act of July 9, 1901, P. L. 614, as amended by the Act of April 3, 1903, P. L. 139(e) ; see Shamokin L. & C. Co. v. Line Mt. Coal Co., 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 222; Rittenberg v. Stein & Specht, 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 554.

The order of the court below is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Rosengrant v. Frank Martz Coach Co.
324 Pa. 511

Case Details

Name
Rosengrant v. Frank Martz Coach Co.
Decision Date
Dec 7, 1936
Citations

324 Pa. 511

Jurisdiction
Pennsylvania

References

Referencing

Nothing yet... Still searching!

Referenced By

Nothing yet... Still searching!